LMU बनावट पदवी खरेदी करण्यासाठी सुलभ मार्ग तुम्ही यशस्वी होऊ शकता

The study was conducted after a demonstration at a primary school in Birmingham and Manchester, which offered the LGBT course, विनामूल्य बनावट महाविद्यालयीन पदवी कसे, fake Leeds Metropolitan University diploma and transcripts, buy LMU fake degree from a real university, खरेदी बनावट GED प्रमाणपत्र, No Outsiders. Jonathan Glazzard and Professor Samuel Stones from the Carnegie School of Education at the University conducted a survey of 366 parents and teachers. एकूण 88% of respondents disagreed that parents should have the right to withdraw their children from the primary school curriculum for LGBT people. Most people (94%) believe that it is important for school children to understand LGBT status. The same proportion (94%) believes that schools have a responsibility to promote LGBT inclusion (which is different from promoting lifestyle).

According to the survey, 88% agree or strongly agree that schools do not educate children about LGBT people and relationships to promote sexual orientation or gender identity, विनामूल्य बनावट महाविद्यालयीन पदवी कसे, fake Leeds Metropolitan University diploma and transcripts, buy LMU fake degree from a real university, खरेदी बनावट GED प्रमाणपत्र, which indicates that respondents understand that the role of schools is to raise awareness of different types of identities. And relationship exists. Respondents were less confident in teaching children different identities from the age of four. फक्त 76% agree that “schools should teach children about different types of relationships from the age of four”. A lower percentage (73%) agrees that “schools should teach same-sex marriage from the age of four”. फक्त 50% of respondents agree that “schools should teach children to understand transgender identity from the age of four”.

Professor Glazzard and Mr. Stones said: “Respondents may think that they need to protect young children from learning LGBT status and relationships because they think the content will cover gender or because they think children are easily affected.” This raises some interesting questions. . पहिला, some four-year-olds have same-sex parents. “They know the same-sex relationship. They may have brothers, विनामूल्य बनावट महाविद्यालयीन पदवी कसे, बनावट Leeds Metropolitan University diploma and transcripts, buy LMU fake degree from a real university, खरेदी बनावट GED प्रमाणपत्र, sisters, aunts and uncles in their families. They agree with homosexuality.” If they don’t see these identities in the school curriculum, they will start to feel that their lives are not reflected in the school. मध्ये. “Secondly, it is worth noting that although early childhood children understand the heterosexual relationship through the theme of the role of ‘family’ and simulated straight weddings, there is a disagreement on the education of same-sex marriage. “Why teach children to understand heterosexual relationships Not LGBT relationships and identities? “The data suggests that there may be a view that children are exposed to different types of people and that this relationship is somewhat harmful.” The results also show that there is a clear resistance to the transgender identity of educated children, This shows the negativity of the transgender community. “Research shows that people’s identity does not change through inclusive sex education.” म्हणून, educating children about LGBT status will not suddenly make them LGBT. ”

One respondent who was identified as a teacher and parent said: “I fully believe that we should teach LGBT in primary school in an age-appropriate way. Children must understand the many changes in identity and relationships in the world. “In my school, We met the same community issues as Birmingham, विनामूल्य बनावट महाविद्यालयीन पदवी कसे, fake Leeds Metropolitan University diploma and transcripts, buy LMU fake degree from a real university, खरेदी बनावट GED प्रमाणपत्र, although I don’t think this should stop us from teaching this course, but it’s not as simple as just starting to learn. “ Having said that, if the teacher is fully supported by the Ministry of Education and OFSTED, the school can continue to learn more easily regardless of the feelings of the community. “At present, the two bodies are sitting on the fence and making decisions with the school. Fair, it has caused great difficulties for schools like ours. “I also believe that the language and interpretation of this course will be misunderstood by the community, and once these communities emerge, it is difficult to break.”